In 2003, a Deputy Prime Minister laid a foundation stone in Greater Noida. In 2006, a Prime Minister inaugurated what stood on it. And twenty years later, that patch of land — 57 acres of it — is the entire business of a company now asking you to buy its shares.
The company is India Exposition Mart Limited (IEML). And its product is, quite literally, empty space.
Think about what that means. IEML owns 17 exhibition halls, about 88,509 square metres of indoor space and another 78,511 square metres outdoors. When nobody's using them, they're vast, echoing, empty rooms. When somebody is, they're a pharma convention, or an automobile show, or the handicrafts fair that half of India's export industry flies in for.
The company's job is to make sure the second thing happens as often as possible.
And it has been doing this well enough to become one of the top four exhibition venues in India by area — and the largest privately owned one. (Though we should flag right away: that ranking comes from a CRISIL report the company itself commissioned and paid for. Every "Source: Crisil Report" in the DRHP carries that asterisk.)
Now IEML wants to list. So let's do what we always do. Let's figure out how it actually makes money, whether that money is growing, and what the numbers are quietly admitting.
Here's the elegant part of this business. IEML doesn't have one revenue stream. It has six, stacked on top of each other like floors — each one capturing a bit more of the value that walks through the gates.
Floor 1: Be the landlord. This is Third-Party Events, and it's the foundation. An outside organiser wants to run a trade fair. IEML hands them the halls under a licence agreement, charges a fee per square metre per day, and steps back. The organiser handles exhibitors, ticketing, programming, risk. IEML also sells them housekeeping, F&B, security, medical and IT services on the side, at a margin.
In FY26 this brought in ₹164.03 crore — 56.44% of revenue. It's the single biggest line, and it's beautifully low-effort. Better still, roughly 72.40% of that revenue came from events that had already been held there in each of the last three years. IHGF comes twice a year. CPHI & P-Mec, Indus Food, Renewable Energy Expo — all annual. The calendar mostly fills itself.
Floor 2: Feed and house the crowd. Everyone attending these events needs a bed and a coffee. So IEML runs ExpoInn — a 136-room guesthouse certified 5-star by the Ministry of Tourism, sitting inside the complex — plus Plume (a leased hotel next door), Mor Stays (managed for a revenue share), and four Bean & Brew cafés. All under a brand called Indeva Hotels and Resorts.
FY26: ₹39.39 crore, 13.55% of revenue. And here's the number that jumps out — occupancy went from 28.63% to 51.86% to 55.88% across three years, on the same 136 rooms. They didn't build anything. They just got much better at filling what they had.
Floor 3: Own the event, not just the room. Why collect a licence fee when you could collect everything? Under Own IPs, IEML conceptualises, trademarks and runs its own shows — India International Hospitality Expo, UP International Trade Show, AYURYOG Expo, Bharat Siksha Expo. It keeps the sponsorship money, the stall fees, the ticket revenue, the brand licensing.
12 IPs on a cumulative basis, 17 registered trademarks, 30 pending applications. FY26 revenue: ₹31.93 crore, 10.99%.
Floor 4: Run someone else's event. Managed Events sits in between. Either IEML takes a fixed fee to handle logistics and execution for an organiser, or — the aggressive version — it takes full ownership of the event's profit and loss and pays the event owner a share of revenue. ₹28.41 crore, 9.77% in FY26.
Floor 5: Charge rent forever. There are 1,800 permanent showrooms inside the complex, operated by 774 handicraft exporters as of July 2026. These aren't event stalls — they're year-round display spaces. IEML provides maintenance and facility management on contract. ₹13.48 crore, 4.64%. Small, but it arrives whether or not a single event happens.
Floor 6: Sell the goods online too. Through subsidiary Expo Digital India, IEML runs ExpoBazaar — a B2B platform exporting Indian handicrafts to the US, Canada, Singapore and Vietnam, with step-down subsidiaries in the USA and Netherlands. ₹11.40 crore, 3.92%.
Add ₹1.99 crore of odds and ends — ad shoots, film shoots, meeting room bookings — and you get ₹290.63 crore of FY26 revenue.
Revenue stream | FY26 (₹ cr) | % | FY25 (₹ cr) | % | FY24 (₹ cr) | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Party Events | 164.03 | 56.44 | 142.91 | 59.26 | 118.40 | 60.80 |
| Hotels & Hospitality | 39.39 | 13.55 | 32.67 | 13.55 | 16.33 | 8.39 |
| Own IPs | 31.93 | 10.99 | 31.15 | 12.91 | 26.73 | 13.73 |
| Managed Events | 28.41 | 9.77 | 14.74 | 6.11 | 16.64 | 8.54 |
| Maintenance Services | 13.48 | 4.64 | 9.25 | 3.83 | 9.23 | 4.74 |
| Export Supply Chain | 11.40 | 3.92 | 8.26 | 3.42 | 5.24 | 2.69 |
| Others | 1.99 | 0.69 | 2.19 | 0.92 | 2.16 | 1.11 |
| Total | 290.63 | 100 | 241.15 | 100 | 194.73 | 100 |
The logic holds together nicely. One asset, six ways to charge for it, and the newer floors — hospitality, ExpoBazaar, showroom maintenance — are specifically designed to earn money on the days when no exhibition is running.
Now look at this table.
FY26 | FY25 | FY24 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third-Party Events | 33 | 38 | 55 |
| Own IP Events | 7 | 11 | 4 |
| Managed Events | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Total events | 44 | 51 | 61 |
Revenue is up 22.17% CAGR over three years. Events are down from 61 to 44.
That's not necessarily bad — it can mean bigger, richer, longer events replacing small ones, which is exactly what a venue wants. Better yield per square metre. But it's worth sitting with, because a venue business has a hard physical ceiling. There are only so many halls and only so many days in a year. Growth from "more events" is finished. Growth now has to come from "more money per event," or from somewhere else entirely.
Which brings us to the P&L.
₹ crore | FY26 | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 290.63 | 241.15 | 194.73 |
| Other income | 8.93 | 8.18 | 9.04 |
| Total income | 299.56 | 249.34 | 203.78 |
| Employee benefits | 37.09 | 27.52 | 19.87 |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 20.66 | 21.40 | 22.29 |
| Finance costs | 2.50 | 3.41 | 3.82 |
| Other expenses | 181.30 | 134.66 | 122.51 |
| Total expenses | 256.78 | 197.24 | 174.78 |
| Profit before tax | 42.58 | 52.30 | 28.99 |
| Total tax | 11.42 | 13.66 | 5.68 |
| Profit for the year | 31.16 | 38.64 | 23.31 |
| EBITDA | 65.74 | 77.11 | 55.10 |
| EBITDA margin | 22.62% | 31.98% | 28.29% |
| Basic EPS (₹) | 4.25 | 5.39 | 3.41 |
Read that bottom half again.
Revenue grew 20.52% in FY26. Profit fell 19.4%. EBITDA margin collapsed from 31.98% to 22.62% — over nine percentage points, gone in a single year. EPS dropped from ₹5.39 to ₹4.25.
So what happened?
This is where most people's eyes glaze over, so let's slow down. Because the entire margin story of FY26 lives inside two innocuous-sounding expense lines.
The culprit is a line called Other expenses, which jumped 34.64% to ₹181.30 crore and went from eating 55.84% of revenue to 62.38%. Inside it sits a sub-line called fairs and exhibition expenses — up 66.93%, from ₹61.12 crore to ₹102.03 crore.
That's the cost of actually running events. And two components blew up.
An empty hall is just concrete and steel. Before an exhibition opens, somebody has to build the entire thing — stall partitions, flooring, fascia and signage, temporary electricals, lighting rigs, aisle carpeting, registration counters, air conditioning ducting, and then dismantle all of it a week later. That's the setup.
For big shows, IEML does this build-out itself and bills it into the event's economics. So setup charges are a cost that scales directly with how much exhibition floor is being dressed up — more halls, more stalls, more days, bigger bill.
In FY26 setup charges rose ₹27.61 crore. And the DRHP is very specific about why: an additional IHGF edition. Setup charges for IHGF alone went from ₹14.34 crore to ₹43.69 crore — a tripling.
Here's the thing the DRHP doesn't say out loud but its own event table shows. IHGF Delhi Fair is India's largest handicrafts trade fair, and it runs twice a year — Spring and Autumn. But look at the dates:
Fiscal | IHGF editions in the top-five events table |
|---|---|
| FY24 | Autumn (Oct 2023), Spring (Feb 2024) — 2 |
| FY25 | Autumn (Oct 2024) — 1 |
| FY26 | Spring 2025 (April 2025), Autumn (Oct 2025), Spring 2026 (Feb 2026) — 3 |
The Spring edition slipped from February to April. February 2025 would have fallen in FY25; April 2025 fell in FY26. So FY25 lost a Spring fair and FY26 got two of them.
That's a calendar accident, not a business breakthrough. And it cuts both ways — it inflated FY26's costs, but it also inflated FY26's revenue. The DRHP notes IHGF Spring fair revenue rose ₹54.39 crore in FY26. Which means a meaningful chunk of that 20.52% revenue growth is a timing artefact that won't repeat in FY27.
This one matters more.
Remember Floor 1 of the business — IEML charges other people a licence fee to use its halls. Licence fee is venue rent. It's the core product.
So when "licence fees" appears as an expense in IEML's own P&L, it means the opposite thing: IEML is paying somebody else for the use of their venue.
And that number went from ₹0.16 crore to ₹16.35 crore in a single year.
The reason, straight from the DRHP: events held at venues other than India Expo Centre and Mart went from 1 event in FY25 to 5 events in FY26.
Let that land. This is a company whose entire moat is owning a 57-acre venue that everybody else pays rent on. In FY26, it went out and became somebody else's tenant — five times over.
And you can see the same lever working in reverse the year before. In FY25, off-campus events dropped from 2 to 1, licence fees fell ₹2.61 crore, and margins expanded to 31.98%. Same dial, turned the other way.
Here's the structural point. When an event happens at IEML's own venue, the venue is a sunk asset — the halls are already built and paid for, so incremental revenue drops through at high margin. When an event happens at somebody else's venue, IEML pays market rent for space it doesn't own, on top of setup, staffing and marketing.
Same show. Completely different unit economics.
IEML is doing this deliberately — taking its Own IP and Managed Event brands to Maharashtra, Karnataka, West Bengal, Delhi and Gujarat, building presence in markets where it owns no property. Strategically that's how you escape a physical ceiling. Financially, it converts a landlord's margins into an event promoter's margins.
FY26's nine-point margin drop is the invoice for that decision. And note the direction of travel: if the strategy works, there will be more off-campus events, not fewer.
The rest of Other expenses moved sensibly, for what it's worth — housekeeping ₹17.53 cr → ₹18.25 cr, power and fuel ₹13.20 cr → ₹15.32 cr, hiring charges ₹4.78 cr → ₹6.09 cr. Nothing dramatic. It really is those two lines.
₹ crore | FY26 | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Property, plant & equipment | 124.67 | 137.06 | 137.57 |
| Capital work-in-progress | 56.27 | 1.93 | 2.08 |
| Right-of-use assets | 21.62 | 21.88 | 22.23 |
| Total non-current assets | 229.91 | 192.62 | 182.67 |
| Trade receivables | 47.22 | 30.45 | 26.56 |
| Cash & cash equivalents | 30.45 | 31.96 | 25.70 |
| Other bank balances | 34.09 | 67.23 | 73.51 |
| Total current assets | 138.82 | 151.75 | 148.58 |
| Total assets | 368.73 | 344.37 | 331.25 |
| Total equity | 275.29 | 254.16 | 224.55 |
| Non-current borrowings | — | 1.56 | 13.86 |
| Current borrowings | 0.60 | 15.03 | 9.42 |
| Total liabilities | 93.44 | 90.21 | 106.70 |
Three things stand out.
One: the debt is essentially gone. Total borrowings fell from ₹23.27 crore in FY24 to ₹0.60 crore in FY26. Debt-equity ratio: 0.16 → 0.11 → 0.05. Finance costs dropped from ₹3.82 crore to ₹2.50 crore. For a business this capital-heavy, that's remarkable — it means the company has genuinely been funding itself from operations.
Two: capital work-in-progress exploded from ₹1.93 crore to ₹56.27 crore. That's the new hall being built. Note that PPE actually declined while CWIP ballooned — construction is underway but hasn't been capitalised yet. Meanwhile "other bank balances" dropped ₹33 crore: fixed deposits being broken to fund it.
Three: receivables are running ahead. Trade receivables jumped 55% to ₹47.22 crore against 20.52% revenue growth. Money is going out for events faster than it's coming back in — which is exactly what you'd expect when you're funding setup costs for shows at venues you don't control.
₹ crore | FY26 | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash before working capital | 60.51 | 71.86 | 49.88 |
| Cash generated from operations | 61.07 | 53.09 | 47.21 |
| Income taxes paid | (8.23) | (14.53) | (21.67) |
| Net cash from operating activities | 52.84 | 38.56 | 25.53 |
| Purchase of PP&E and intangibles | (62.28) | (23.38) | (5.24) |
| Proceeds from bank deposits (net) | 33.14 | 6.28 | 13.39 |
| Net cash from investing | (25.02) | (13.45) | 15.95 |
| Repayment of term loans | (11.15) | (9.55) | (9.95) |
| Dividend paid | (9.27) | (9.27) | (9.25) |
| Net cash from financing | (29.67) | (18.91) | (23.00) |
| Net change in cash | (1.85) | 6.20 | 18.49 |
| Closing cash | 30.45 | 31.96 | 25.70 |
Here's the redemption arc for that ugly P&L.
Profit fell 19.4% in FY26. But operating cash flow rose 37%, from ₹38.56 crore to ₹52.84 crore. And ₹52.84 crore of operating cash against ₹31.16 crore of accounting profit is a healthy ratio.
Why the divergence? Because a big chunk of what the P&L calls a cost isn't cash leaving the building. Depreciation alone is ₹20.66 crore a year — the accounting shadow of a venue that was paid for years ago. This is the classic infrastructure-asset profile: profits look modest, cash generation is strong.
Capex, meanwhile, has gone vertical: ₹5.24 crore → ₹23.38 crore → ₹62.28 crore. In FY26 the company spent more on capex than it generated in operating cash, and funded the gap by breaking ₹33 crore of deposits. It's been paying a steady ~₹9 crore dividend throughout, and clearing debt on top.
Which raises the obvious question. If it's self-funding, why the IPO?
The DRHP names five strategies. Only two have IPO money behind them.
Strategy 1 — Expand and upgrade the existing venue. This is what the fresh issue funds:
Use of net proceeds | ₹ crore | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upgrade AHUs, chillers, cooling towers, lifts, escalators, VFDs | 63.82 | Nil | 21.00 | 42.82 |
| Renovate Halls 4 and 6, build Hall 18 | 30.81 | 8.32 | 5.62 | 16.86 |
| General corporate purposes | [●] (max 25% of gross) |
Worth being clear-eyed here. The offer is a fresh issue of 75,00,000 shares and an offer for sale of 2,27,41,002 shares. So roughly three-quarters of the shares on offer are existing shareholders selling — and the company sees none of that money.
Of what it does receive, the largest line is air handling units, chillers and lifts. That's maintenance, not expansion. And the bulk of the spend lands in FY29 — two full years out. The genuinely new capacity, Hall 18, is part of a ₹40.97 crore project of which ₹10.16 crore is already spent from the company's own pocket.
Strategy 2 — Mohali. Under an MoU dated April 30, 2026, IEML and Exhicon Events Media Solutions will jointly bid to develop and operate a convention centre in Mohali, Punjab, tendered by GMADA. It would run through an SPV — 65% Exhicon, 35% IEML.
The DRHP frames this as capturing upside without full development risk. Read plainly: it's a minority stake in a special purpose vehicle that hasn't been formed yet, to bid on a project that hasn't been won yet, under an MoU rather than a binding agreement. It is the only concrete answer to the "everything depends on one venue" problem — and it is contingent at every single step.
Strategy 3 — More Own IPs. Launch new shows (Money Alpha 360 in December 2026; Global Bhakti Fest, co-owned, also December 2026) and selectively acquire existing events from third-party organisers.
But check the trend. Own IP revenue share has gone 13.73% → 12.91% → 10.99%. Cumulative IPs went 6 → 9 → 12. The portfolio is being built faster than it's being monetised — FY26 IP revenue of ₹31.93 crore was almost flat against FY25's ₹31.15 crore, and even that small rise came mainly from acquiring Garment Technology India as a subsidiary, which reclassified an existing event as an owned IP.
Strategy 4 — Scale ExpoBazaar. More sellers, more buyers, more categories, deeper logistics, new geographies. Expo Digital SCM UK Ltd was incorporated on 21 July 2026 for the UK, Scotland and Ireland. Revenue: ₹5.24 cr → ₹8.26 cr → ₹11.40 cr. Fastest-growing vertical in percentage terms, genuinely uncorrelated with the event calendar — and, at 3.92% of revenue, too small to move the group for years.
Strategy 5 — More hotels. Plume leased for nine years from June 2026. Mor Stays on a fourteen-year management agreement to 2040. An LOI with R.P. Hotels & Resorts for Hotel Sheetal Regency. Plus two new trademarked brands: Irise Hotel (corporate stay) and Saranga Retreats (luxury).
The DRHP is admirably blunt about those last two: no definitive agreements exist for any property under either brand. They are, for now, trademarks.
The tailwind is real but shared. India's MICE market is put at ₹47,700 crore, growing at 14.1% CAGR (FY20–26P) and projected to reach ₹75,000–80,000 crore by FY30P. But the same report notes hotels take 65–68% of that market against 30–32% for convention centres. The rising tide doesn't lift venue operators proportionally.
Every growth strategy points away from the high-margin core. Managed events, off-campus IP deployment, leased hotels, a 35% JV stake, a B2B commerce platform — each trades margin or control for top-line growth. FY26's nine-point margin drop is the first instalment, not a one-off.
Some of FY26's growth is borrowed from FY25. Three IHGF editions instead of one is a calendar quirk. It flattered revenue and inflated costs, and FY27 won't have it.
Concentration everywhere. One venue. On leasehold land, not freehold. A small number of large organisers driving the biggest vertical. Bi-annual anchors like IHGF meaning results swing hard between periods. Security and housekeeping outsourced.
And a curious loose end. On page 257, the DRHP refers to "the Tier-II city venues we intend to manage under our asset-light expansion strategy described above." No such strategy appears anywhere in the strategies section. Either a growth plank was cut late in drafting, or it's a cross-reference error. Either way, there's nothing there to evaluate.
Strip it back and India Exposition Mart is a fundamentally sound thing: a debt-free, cash-generative landlord with a repeat-customer base, a physical asset that's genuinely hard to replicate, and a hospitality business quietly doubling alongside it.
But it's a landlord that has run out of room. Events are falling. The halls are finite. And so it's doing the only thing it can — taking its brands on the road, renting other people's venues, buying other people's events, taking minority stakes in convention centres it doesn't control.
That's a rational strategy. It's also a different business. The one that earned 31.98% EBITDA margins was a venue owner. The one that earned 22.62% is becoming an events company that happens to own a venue.
The IPO money, meanwhile, mostly goes to chillers and lifts — and mostly in FY29.
Whether that's a company transitioning intelligently or diluting what made it special is the question. The DRHP gives you the numbers to argue either side.
This is a draft red herring prospectus — offer size, price and structure can all change before the RHP is filed. Nothing here is investment advice, just a reading of a public document. Industry positioning claims come from a CRISIL report commissioned and paid for by the company

