Annual Financial Analysis · FY2026
Care Health Insurance
A year of remarkable top-line expansion — but rising claims and a combined ratio above 100% signal that scale alone won't restore the bottom line.
Headline Numbers
Gross Written Premium
₹9,805 Cr
↑ 22.1% YoY
Net Earned Premium
₹7,256 Cr
↑ 14.3% YoY
Profit After Tax
₹12 Cr
↓ 92.2% YoY
Operating Profit
(₹151 Cr)
Loss vs ₹49 Cr profit
Combined Ratio
107%
↑ from 103%
Mcap / GWP
1.17x
↓ from 1.43x
Revenue & Premium Account
Care Health posted Gross Written Premium of ₹9,805 Cr in FY26, up sharply from ₹8,033 Cr in FY25 — a 22.1% surge reflecting aggressive customer acquisition and a buoyant health insurance market. Net Earned Premium grew more modestly at 14.3%, as the retention ratio slipped from 79% to 74%, meaning a significantly larger share of risk was ceded to reinsurers.
| Particulars | FY2026 (₹ Cr) | FY2025 (₹ Cr) | Change (₹ Cr) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premium Income | ||||
| Gross Written Premium (GWP) | 9,805.32 | 8,033.19 | +1,772.13 | +22.1% |
| Reinsured Premium (Ceded) | (2,549.38) | (1,685.97) | +863.41 | +51.2% |
| Net Earned Premium (NEP) | 7,255.94 | 6,347.22 | +908.72 | +14.3% |
| Other Revenue | ||||
| Interest, Dividend & Rent | 666.25 | 513.17 | +153.08 | +29.8% |
| P&L on Sale of Investments (Net) | 16.41 | 14.44 | +1.97 | +13.6% |
| Other Revenue | 1.94 | 1.96 | -0.02 | -1.0% |
| Total Revenue | 7,940.54 | 6,876.79 | +1,063.75 | +15.5% |
Premium Account — FY25 vs FY26
Top-line momentum is real
A 22% GWP jump in a competitive health insurance market is commendable. However, ceded premiums rose 51% — nearly double the pace of GWP growth — which limits how much top-line expansion flows into net earned revenue.
Profit & Loss Summary
The most critical story of FY26 is the sharp deterioration in the claims ratio. Net claims incurred jumped from ₹4,096 Cr to ₹5,051 Cr — a 23.3% increase that outpaced premium growth. The combined effect of higher claims, commissions, and operating expenses pushed the operating line into a loss of ₹151 Cr, compared to a profit of ₹49 Cr in FY25. Only the investment portfolio kept PAT in positive territory.
| Particulars | FY2026 (₹ Cr) | FY2025 (₹ Cr) | Change (₹ Cr) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ||||
| Net Earned Premium | 7,255.94 | 6,347.22 | +908.72 | +14.3% |
| Investment & Other Income | 684.60 | 529.57 | +155.03 | +29.3% |
| Total Revenue | 7,940.54 | 6,876.79 | +1,063.75 | +15.5% |
| Expenses | ||||
| Claims Incurred (Net) | 5,050.89 | 4,095.89 | +955.00 | +23.3% |
| Commission (Net) | 1,482.79 | 1,356.84 | +125.95 | +9.3% |
| Operating Expenses | 1,386.72 | 1,222.49 | +164.23 | +13.4% |
| Other Provisions & Liabilities | 22.12 | 15.09 | +7.03 | +46.6% |
| Total Expenses | 8,091.75 | 6,828.08 | +1,263.67 | +18.5% |
| Profitability | ||||
| Operating Profit / (Loss) | (151.21) | 48.71 | -199.92 | — |
| Profit Before Tax (PBT) | 17.81 | 208.20 | -190.39 | -91.4% |
| Profit After Tax (PAT) | 12.16 | 155.18 | -143.02 | -92.2% |
Expense Breakdown — FY25 vs FY26
Profitability Trend — PBT & PAT
Investment income is the only lifeline
Without ₹666 Cr of interest, dividend and rent income, Care Health would have reported a significant net loss. The company is operationally loss-making in FY26. A high-rate environment is masking deeper underwriting stress.
Key Ratios
All four key ratios tell the same story — a year of expansion that came at a cost to underwriting discipline. The combined ratio crossing 107% is the most critical signal, while the Mcap/GWP compression reflects market caution despite strong premium growth.
Combined Ratio
Above 100% = underwriting loss
Claim Ratio
Claims per ₹1 of earned premium
Commission Ratio
Marginal improvement YoY
Mcap / GWP
Market cap: ₹11,495 Cr
| Ratio | Formula | FY2026 | FY2025 | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Ratio | (Claims + Commission + Opex) / NEP | 107% | 103% | Deteriorated |
| Claim Ratio | Net Claims / NEP | 70% | 65% | Deteriorated |
| Commission Ratio | Net Commission / NEP | 19% | 20% | Improved |
| Expense Ratio (Opex / NEP) | Operating Expenses / NEP | 19.1% | 19.3% | Stable |
| Net Retention Ratio | NEP / GWP | 74% | 79% | More risk ceded |
| Ceded Premium Ratio | Ceded / GWP | 26% | 21% | Higher reinsurance cost |
| Mcap / GWP | Market Cap ÷ GWP | 1.17x | 1.43x | Compressed but not cheap |
Ratio Comparison — FY25 vs FY26
The combined ratio is the core concern
A combined ratio of 107% means Care Health lost ₹7 on underwriting for every ₹100 of premium earned. In FY25 the loss was ₹3. The trajectory is worsening, and investment income is currently bridging the gap — but that is not a sustainable substitute for underwriting discipline.
Balance Sheet Snapshot
With the complete balance sheet now available, the full picture is both more detailed and more revealing. Total assets grew ₹370 Cr YoY to ₹2,743 Cr. The sources side shows the company retired its ₹100 Cr borrowing in FY26 — a positive deleveraging move. On the application side, policyholder investments surged 43.9% from ₹5,933 Cr to ₹8,539 Cr, reflecting strong business growth. However, net current assets are deeply negative in both years, driven by large current liabilities and provisions that are structural to insurance balance sheets and do not represent a liquidity concern in isolation.
| Particulars | FY2026 (₹ Cr) | FY2025 (₹ Cr) | Change (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of Funds | |||
| Share Capital | 995.87 | 974.18 | +21.69 |
| Share Application Money | 0.28 | — | — |
| Reserves & Surplus | 1,670.22 | 1,357.02 | +313.20 |
| Fair Value Change — Shareholders' Funds | (27.52) | 27.91 | −55.43 |
| Fair Value Change — Policyholders' Funds | 3.80 | 13.04 | −9.24 |
| Borrowings | — | 100.00 | −100.00 (repaid) |
| Total Sources of Funds | 2,742.65 | 2,372.15 | +370.50 |
| Application of Funds — Long-Term Assets | |||
| Investments — Shareholders | 2,404.92 | 2,466.33 | −61.41 |
| Investments — Policyholders | 8,538.77 | 5,933.11 | +2,605.66 |
| Fixed Assets | 26.56 | 33.85 | −7.29 |
| Deferred Tax Asset (Net) | 37.75 | 44.02 | −6.27 |
| Current Assets | |||
| Cash & Bank Balances | 521.88 | 193.46 | +328.42 |
| Advances & Other Assets | 465.01 | 350.12 | +114.89 |
| Sub-total (A) — Current Assets | 986.89 | 543.58 | +443.31 |
| Current Liabilities & Provisions | |||
| Current Liabilities | 5,459.41 | 3,343.10 | +2,116.31 |
| Provisions | 3,792.83 | 3,305.64 | +487.19 |
| Sub-total (B) — Current Liabilities | 9,252.24 | 6,648.74 | +2,603.50 |
| Net Current Assets (C) = (A − B) | (8,265.35) | (6,105.16) | −2,160.19 |
| Total Application of Funds | 2,742.65 | 2,372.15 | +370.50 |
Balance sheet is a relative bright spot
Shareholders' fund grew ₹283 Cr YoY despite the 92% PAT drop — driven by fresh capital and reserve growth. The company fully repaid its ₹100 Cr borrowing in FY26, strengthening the balance sheet. The Fair Value Change on shareholders' funds swung from +₹27.91 Cr to −₹27.52 Cr (a ₹55 Cr reversal), reflecting mark-to-market pressure on the investment portfolio. The deeply negative net current assets are structural to insurance companies — current liabilities include unearned premium reserves and claim provisions, which are not cash outflows in the traditional sense.
Market Valuation
At a market capitalisation of ₹11,495 Cr, the Mcap/GWP multiple has compressed from 1.43x to 1.17x. The market is pricing in premium growth while simultaneously discounting the underwriting deterioration. For a health insurer growing at 22% GWP, 1.17x is not expensive by sector norms — but the combined ratio expansion provides little comfort for near-term earnings multiples.
| Valuation Metric | FY2026 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Capitalisation | ₹11,495 Cr | ₹11,495 Cr* |
| Gross Written Premium (GWP) | ₹9,805.32 Cr | ₹8,033.19 Cr |
| Mcap / GWP | 1.17x | 1.43x |
| Mcap / PAT (P/E implied) | 945x | 74x |
| Mcap / Net Earned Premium | 1.58x | 1.81x |
*Same Mcap used for FY25 as only current market cap (₹11,495 Cr) was provided. The P/E ratio of 945x for FY26 reflects the near-zero PAT and should be interpreted with caution.
Five Things to Watch in FY27