← All research reports | UnlistedZone Care Health Insurance
UZ
UnlistedZone Research & Analysis
Insurance Sector  ·  Deep Dive
FY2026 Annual Results Care Health

Annual Financial Analysis · FY2026

Care Health Insurance

Strong Premium Growth,
Profitability Under Pressure

A year of remarkable top-line expansion — but rising claims and a combined ratio above 100% signal that scale alone won't restore the bottom line.

For the year ended 31st March, 2026  |  All figures in ₹ Crores unless stated  |  Compared with FY2025

Headline Numbers

Gross Written Premium

₹9,805 Cr

↑ 22.1% YoY

Net Earned Premium

₹7,256 Cr

↑ 14.3% YoY

Profit After Tax

₹12 Cr

↓ 92.2% YoY

Operating Profit

(₹151 Cr)

Loss vs ₹49 Cr profit

Combined Ratio

107%

↑ from 103%

Mcap / GWP

1.17x

↓ from 1.43x

Revenue & Premium Account

Care Health posted Gross Written Premium of ₹9,805 Cr in FY26, up sharply from ₹8,033 Cr in FY25 — a 22.1% surge reflecting aggressive customer acquisition and a buoyant health insurance market. Net Earned Premium grew more modestly at 14.3%, as the retention ratio slipped from 79% to 74%, meaning a significantly larger share of risk was ceded to reinsurers.

Particulars FY2026 (₹ Cr) FY2025 (₹ Cr) Change (₹ Cr) Change (%)
Premium Income
Gross Written Premium (GWP) 9,805.328,033.19 +1,772.13+22.1%
Reinsured Premium (Ceded) (2,549.38)(1,685.97) +863.41+51.2%
Net Earned Premium (NEP) 7,255.946,347.22 +908.72+14.3%
Other Revenue
Interest, Dividend & Rent 666.25513.17 +153.08+29.8%
P&L on Sale of Investments (Net) 16.4114.44 +1.97+13.6%
Other Revenue 1.941.96 -0.02-1.0%
Total Revenue 7,940.546,876.79 +1,063.75+15.5%

Premium Account — FY25 vs FY26

GWP
Net Earned Premium
Ceded Premium
GWP: FY25 8033, FY26 9805. NEP: FY25 6347, FY26 7256. Ceded: FY25 1686, FY26 2549.

Top-line momentum is real

A 22% GWP jump in a competitive health insurance market is commendable. However, ceded premiums rose 51% — nearly double the pace of GWP growth — which limits how much top-line expansion flows into net earned revenue.

Profit & Loss Summary

The most critical story of FY26 is the sharp deterioration in the claims ratio. Net claims incurred jumped from ₹4,096 Cr to ₹5,051 Cr — a 23.3% increase that outpaced premium growth. The combined effect of higher claims, commissions, and operating expenses pushed the operating line into a loss of ₹151 Cr, compared to a profit of ₹49 Cr in FY25. Only the investment portfolio kept PAT in positive territory.

Particulars FY2026 (₹ Cr) FY2025 (₹ Cr) Change (₹ Cr) Change (%)
Revenue
Net Earned Premium 7,255.946,347.22 +908.72+14.3%
Investment & Other Income 684.60529.57 +155.03+29.3%
Total Revenue 7,940.546,876.79 +1,063.75+15.5%
Expenses
Claims Incurred (Net) 5,050.894,095.89 +955.00+23.3%
Commission (Net) 1,482.791,356.84 +125.95+9.3%
Operating Expenses 1,386.721,222.49 +164.23+13.4%
Other Provisions & Liabilities 22.1215.09 +7.03+46.6%
Total Expenses 8,091.756,828.08 +1,263.67+18.5%
Profitability
Operating Profit / (Loss) (151.21)48.71 -199.92—
Profit Before Tax (PBT) 17.81208.20 -190.39-91.4%
Profit After Tax (PAT) 12.16155.18 -143.02-92.2%

Expense Breakdown — FY25 vs FY26

Claims
Commission
Operating Expenses
Claims FY25 4096, FY26 5051. Commission FY25 1357, FY26 1483. Opex FY25 1222, FY26 1387.

Profitability Trend — PBT & PAT

PBT
PAT
PBT FY25: 208, FY26: 18. PAT FY25: 155, FY26: 12.

Investment income is the only lifeline

Without ₹666 Cr of interest, dividend and rent income, Care Health would have reported a significant net loss. The company is operationally loss-making in FY26. A high-rate environment is masking deeper underwriting stress.

Key Ratios

All four key ratios tell the same story — a year of expansion that came at a cost to underwriting discipline. The combined ratio crossing 107% is the most critical signal, while the Mcap/GWP compression reflects market caution despite strong premium growth.

Combined Ratio

107% FY25: 103%

Above 100% = underwriting loss

Claim Ratio

70% FY25: 65%

Claims per ₹1 of earned premium

Commission Ratio

19% FY25: 20%

Marginal improvement YoY

Mcap / GWP

1.17x FY25: 1.43x

Market cap: ₹11,495 Cr

Ratio Formula FY2026 FY2025 Assessment
Combined Ratio (Claims + Commission + Opex) / NEP 107% 103% Deteriorated
Claim Ratio Net Claims / NEP 70% 65% Deteriorated
Commission Ratio Net Commission / NEP 19% 20% Improved
Expense Ratio (Opex / NEP) Operating Expenses / NEP 19.1% 19.3% Stable
Net Retention Ratio NEP / GWP 74% 79% More risk ceded
Ceded Premium Ratio Ceded / GWP 26% 21% Higher reinsurance cost
Mcap / GWP Market Cap ÷ GWP 1.17x 1.43x Compressed but not cheap

Ratio Comparison — FY25 vs FY26

FY25
FY26
Combined: FY25 103, FY26 107. Claim: FY25 65, FY26 70. Commission: FY25 20, FY26 19. Expense: FY25 19.3, FY26 19.1.

The combined ratio is the core concern

A combined ratio of 107% means Care Health lost ₹7 on underwriting for every ₹100 of premium earned. In FY25 the loss was ₹3. The trajectory is worsening, and investment income is currently bridging the gap — but that is not a sustainable substitute for underwriting discipline.

Balance Sheet Snapshot

With the complete balance sheet now available, the full picture is both more detailed and more revealing. Total assets grew ₹370 Cr YoY to ₹2,743 Cr. The sources side shows the company retired its ₹100 Cr borrowing in FY26 — a positive deleveraging move. On the application side, policyholder investments surged 43.9% from ₹5,933 Cr to ₹8,539 Cr, reflecting strong business growth. However, net current assets are deeply negative in both years, driven by large current liabilities and provisions that are structural to insurance balance sheets and do not represent a liquidity concern in isolation.

Particulars FY2026 (₹ Cr) FY2025 (₹ Cr) Change (₹ Cr)
Sources of Funds
Share Capital 995.87974.18+21.69
Share Application Money 0.28——
Reserves & Surplus 1,670.221,357.02+313.20
Fair Value Change — Shareholders' Funds (27.52)27.91−55.43
Fair Value Change — Policyholders' Funds 3.8013.04−9.24
Borrowings —100.00−100.00 (repaid)
Total Sources of Funds 2,742.652,372.15+370.50
Application of Funds — Long-Term Assets
Investments — Shareholders 2,404.922,466.33−61.41
Investments — Policyholders 8,538.775,933.11+2,605.66
Fixed Assets 26.5633.85−7.29
Deferred Tax Asset (Net) 37.7544.02−6.27
Current Assets
Cash & Bank Balances 521.88193.46+328.42
Advances & Other Assets 465.01350.12+114.89
Sub-total (A) — Current Assets 986.89543.58+443.31
Current Liabilities & Provisions
Current Liabilities 5,459.413,343.10+2,116.31
Provisions 3,792.833,305.64+487.19
Sub-total (B) — Current Liabilities 9,252.246,648.74+2,603.50
Net Current Assets (C) = (A − B) (8,265.35)(6,105.16)−2,160.19
Total Application of Funds 2,742.652,372.15+370.50

Balance sheet is a relative bright spot

Shareholders' fund grew ₹283 Cr YoY despite the 92% PAT drop — driven by fresh capital and reserve growth. The company fully repaid its ₹100 Cr borrowing in FY26, strengthening the balance sheet. The Fair Value Change on shareholders' funds swung from +₹27.91 Cr to −₹27.52 Cr (a ₹55 Cr reversal), reflecting mark-to-market pressure on the investment portfolio. The deeply negative net current assets are structural to insurance companies — current liabilities include unearned premium reserves and claim provisions, which are not cash outflows in the traditional sense.

Market Valuation

At a market capitalisation of ₹11,495 Cr, the Mcap/GWP multiple has compressed from 1.43x to 1.17x. The market is pricing in premium growth while simultaneously discounting the underwriting deterioration. For a health insurer growing at 22% GWP, 1.17x is not expensive by sector norms — but the combined ratio expansion provides little comfort for near-term earnings multiples.

Valuation Metric FY2026 FY2025
Market Capitalisation ₹11,495 Cr₹11,495 Cr*
Gross Written Premium (GWP) ₹9,805.32 Cr₹8,033.19 Cr
Mcap / GWP 1.17x1.43x
Mcap / PAT (P/E implied) 945x74x
Mcap / Net Earned Premium 1.58x1.81x

*Same Mcap used for FY25 as only current market cap (₹11,495 Cr) was provided. The P/E ratio of 945x for FY26 reflects the near-zero PAT and should be interpreted with caution.

Five Things to Watch in FY27

Overall Verdict

Care Health Insurance is a growth story at an inflection point. The top line is impressive — but FY26 has made abundantly clear that the company cannot grow its way out of underwriting losses. A combined ratio of 107%, a claims ratio of 70%, and a 92% collapse in PAT are not the hallmarks of a business firing on all cylinders. The investment portfolio is doing the heavy lifting, and that is a borrowed arrangement at best. The path to sustainable profitability runs through claims management, product mix discipline, and cost leverage — not premium volume alone. FY27 will be the real test of whether FY26's deterioration is a temporary spike or the beginning of a structural trend.